Go to main content

Overview

Malaysia has significantly strengthened its renewable energy (RE) policy in recent years, guided by ekonomi.gov.my/sites/default/files/2023-09/National%20Energy%20Transition%20Roadmap_0.pdf and long-term commitments to achieve net zero by 2050. The country targets 31% RE in installed capacity by 2025, 40% by 2035, and 70% by 2050. Despite strong procurement frameworks, planning procedures, and fiscal support, Malaysia continues to face major structural barriers, most notably in grid access, grid connection, and the development of carbon pricing mechanisms. Overcoming these issues is essential to meet rising solar penetration and align with long-term decarbonization ambitions.

Key barriers and solutions

Malaysia’s procurement framework is relatively mature, with long-term PPAs and strong off-takers such as Tenaga Nasional Berhad (TNB) www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2023/Mar/IRENA_Malaysia_energy_transition_outlook_2023.pdf. However, ownership restrictions in LSS projects limit foreign participation. Currency risks remain a challenge because all PPAs are denominated in Malaysian Ringgit, exposing foreign developers to exchange-rate volatility. Furthermore, Malaysia operates only a voluntary carbon market (BCX), and its planned carbon pricing mechanism is still under design. 

Grid access and connection procedures are among the most significant structural obstacles. Third-party access (TPA) to the grid is not yet implemented, and wheeling charges remain undefined, preventing the growth of off-site corporate PPAs. Developers must cover nearly all grid connection costs, including deep grid upgrades and long-distance interconnection lines. This cost burden makes many biomass, small hydro, and remote solar projects economically unfeasible. Limited regional interconnections and uneven distribution system planning further restrict large-scale VRE integration.

While renewables receive priority dispatch under www.seda.gov.my/policies/renewable-energy-act-2011/, fossil fuel plants continue to operate under “take-or-pay” PPAs with guaranteed capacity payments, reducing the space for solar output. Battery energy storage is still in early stages, with utility-scale installations planned only after 2030. Malaysia lacks formal forecasting requirements, aggregation frameworks, or penalties for inaccurate VRE forecasts. Market-based tools such as intra-day markets and ancillary services markets are not yet implemented www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2023/Mar/IRENA_Malaysia_energy_transition_outlook_2023.pdf. These gaps will become increasingly critical as Malaysia approaches higher solar penetration.

Permitting processes for solar PV are well structured, but environmental and social assessments for large hydro remain lengthy and complex. Spatial planning mechanisms such as Renewable Energy Zones (RE Zones) help identify suitable sites, yet public engagement is not consistently integrated into project development www.seda.gov.my/reportal/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/MyRER_webVer-1.pdf Although Malaysia’s transition plans assess socio-economic co-benefits and outline re-skilling programs, incentives for community ownership of renewable projects are still lacking.

In terms of fossil phase-out strategy, TNB aims to net zero by 2050 and halve coal capacity by 2035. However, strong market-based disincentives are not yet in place to accelerate the transition. Cross-sectoral RE targets remain uneven: while solar targets are well developed, wind is absent, and heating/cooling and industrial RE targets remain underdefined.

Assessment Results

Legend: Low Barriers Medium Barriers High Barriers