Korea
Compare Assessments
Overview
The South Korean government has pledged “Net Zero” by 2050 and targeted a 21.6% share of renewables in power generation by 2030. Although South Korea has been one of the leading countries in adding wind and solar capacity among Southeast and East Asian nations, the share of wind and solar in actual power generation remains low at 5.77% (Ember, 2024). This gap reflects limited incentives, weak carbon pricing, grid delays, and insufficient local engagement. To realign with national goals, South Korea could strengthen its regulatory framework with fiscal incentives, improve land-use coordination, enhance community participation, and provide concrete support for affected workers and residents.
Key barriers and solutions
Since the introduction of the Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) in 2012, large utilities have been required to meet annual renewable energy quotas (i.e., 13.5% in 2024 and 15% in 2026). However, these obligation levels remain too limited to meaningfully accelerate renewable energy deployment.
South Korea’s renewable energy expansion also faces structural challenges related to grid capacity and curtailment, as transmission infrastructure has not kept pace with the rapid expansion of large-scale generation. In 2022 alone, Jeju Island experienced 132 curtailment events totaling 29 GWh. Grid development planning continues to be hindered by both technical and social barriers, including public opposition, land-acquisition difficulties, and slow permitting, often delaying projects by up to a decade. At the same time, smart grid technology in South Korea is well established and can help alleviate grid congestion through smart metering, real-time data, and forecasting.
In addition, the country’s carbon pricing and Emissions Trading System (ETS) remain relatively weak. The ETS cap closely tracks actual emissions, and most allowances are allocated for free, resulting in low carbon prices that do not meaningfully influence the economics of the power sector. Consequently, coal remains cost-competitive despite national climate commitments.
Spatial planning poses another significant obstacle. Renewable energy siting is not systematically integrated into municipal land-use plans, leading to ad-hoc approvals and frequent resident opposition. This fragmentation complicates project development and slows deployment.
Social acceptance remains a pervasive challenge across Korea’s energy transition. Public input often enters the process too late, and socio-economic impacts on local communities are not consistently assessed. Although the government has been offering economic incentives for community-owned projects since 2010, local involvement in siting, consultation, and co-benefit schemes is still not sufficiently reflected in renewable energy projects
Assessment Results
Legend:
-
1. Risk Mitigation and Procurement Initiatives
-
2. Planning and Permitting
-
3. Power System Flexibility for RE Integration
-
4. Grids
-
A. Fossil Fuel Phase-Out
-
B. Targets
-
C. Just Transition